Comments on: The Naming of Historical Events https://hankeringforhistory.com/the-naming-of-historical-events/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-naming-of-historical-events Hanker: To have a strong, often restless desire, in this case for--you guessed it--history! Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:04:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Grant https://hankeringforhistory.com/the-naming-of-historical-events/#comment-960 Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:20:48 +0000 http://hankeringforhistory.wordpress.com/?p=3305#comment-960 In reply to Riiiiight.

Now you can again!

]]> By: Riiiiight https://hankeringforhistory.com/the-naming-of-historical-events/#comment-817 Wed, 07 Aug 2013 20:07:00 +0000 http://hankeringforhistory.wordpress.com/?p=3305#comment-817 It was not unusual during the Civil War for the North and South to call the same battle by different names. For example, what is generally known as Battle of Bull Run was called Battle of Manassas by the South.

(I see that I cannot comment through WP anymore.)

a/k/a Spencercourt

]]> By: sheafferhistorian https://hankeringforhistory.com/the-naming-of-historical-events/#comment-802 Sun, 28 Jul 2013 03:11:43 +0000 http://hankeringforhistory.wordpress.com/?p=3305#comment-802 Reblogged this on Practically Historical.

]]>