Comments on: Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) https://hankeringforhistory.com/youngstown-sheet-tube-co-v-sawyer-1952/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=youngstown-sheet-tube-co-v-sawyer-1952 Hanker: To have a strong, often restless desire, in this case for--you guessed it--history! Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:05:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Bob Hillier https://hankeringforhistory.com/youngstown-sheet-tube-co-v-sawyer-1952/#comment-786 Sat, 11 May 2013 12:38:30 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=10690#comment-786 This reminds me of the famous exchanges between King James I and Chief Justice Coke who reminded the king: “…the King ought not be subject to any man, but subject to God and the law.”

]]> By: Grant https://hankeringforhistory.com/youngstown-sheet-tube-co-v-sawyer-1952/#comment-785 Fri, 10 May 2013 18:24:25 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=10690#comment-785 I’ve seen books, such as “Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong,” and while I enjoy those, I believe there is a bigger problem in education. It isn’t necessarily the “lies,” but often the overlooked events that I want to know about.

I’ve toyed with an idea for a book about historical concepts that should have been taught, or given more than one line, but that never surface in the classroom–at least when I was in school.

]]> By: roberta4949 https://hankeringforhistory.com/youngstown-sheet-tube-co-v-sawyer-1952/#comment-784 Thu, 09 May 2013 19:53:52 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=10690#comment-784 this is good to know they never taught us in school about this, I like how the court guy said that the president had authority over the navy and army not the people, the industries or country as a whole, (or individual parts which make up the whole either.) pretty cool. sometimes you can find logic in them capital hills, to bad it is few and far between.

]]>