Comments on: Is The King’s Speech Historically Accurate? https://hankeringforhistory.com/is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate Hanker: To have a strong, often restless desire, in this case for--you guessed it--history! Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:46:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: unknown https://hankeringforhistory.com/is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate/#comment-89029 Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:46:02 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=8390#comment-89029 In reply to blake jones.

you suck big weenis

]]> By: Unknown https://hankeringforhistory.com/is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate/#comment-89028 Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:45:12 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=8390#comment-89028 Sucks big Weenis

]]> By: Jono gee https://hankeringforhistory.com/is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate/#comment-89023 Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:39:48 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=8390#comment-89023 Thats a funny one, i hate this film

]]> By: blake jones https://hankeringforhistory.com/is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate/#comment-89022 Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:36:50 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=8390#comment-89022 this finna be a bruh moment
Front?

]]> By: Tammy https://hankeringforhistory.com/is-the-kings-speech-historically-accurate/#comment-644 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:17:26 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=8390#comment-644 This is why historians are historians and dramatists dramatists. Can’t we all get along? I am disappointed in the attitude of ”oh well, its for a good story”. No. We can tell great stories that are accurate. History is full of interesting stories. The Churchill mistake is inexcusable. Great Post, Grant!

]]>