Comments on: Constitutional Limitations – Separation of Powers https://hankeringforhistory.com/constitutional-limitations-separation-of-powers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=constitutional-limitations-separation-of-powers Hanker: To have a strong, often restless desire, in this case for--you guessed it--history! Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:23:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Grant https://hankeringforhistory.com/constitutional-limitations-separation-of-powers/#comment-627 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:47:31 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=7104#comment-627 In reply to dpatrickgray.

Well of course! It is also like no President of the United States will do what is needed to fix this country… If they did, they might not get re-elected.

]]> By: dpatrickgray https://hankeringforhistory.com/constitutional-limitations-separation-of-powers/#comment-626 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:13:36 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=7104#comment-626 Seems as though the expansion of executive power is cumulative, whether Democrat or Republican no one wants to give up the power or authority earned by those who came before them.

]]> By: Grant https://hankeringforhistory.com/constitutional-limitations-separation-of-powers/#comment-625 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 04:32:23 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=7104#comment-625 Ha ha, they hated him so much that they carved his face into a mountain…

]]> By: sheafferhistorian https://hankeringforhistory.com/constitutional-limitations-separation-of-powers/#comment-624 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 02:18:52 +0000 https://www.hankeringforhistory.com/?p=7104#comment-624 TR did use the weight of the office, which was off-putting to legislators from both parties. Democrats despised him because he pushed their agenda better than they did. Republicans had turned hard to the right because of Populism.

]]>